Comments on: Rolling Stones To Play 2006 Super Bowl

By: MusicSmartie

MusicSmartie — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 04:26:12 +0000

yeah this is going to be fine!!!!!!!!!

By: LEANN BEGAY

LEANN BEGAY — Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:08:01 +0000

Hey!!!! hello!!! I LOVE ROCK FOR MY LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By: Angel

Angel — Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:19:42 +0000

I think that the stones are WAY overated.

By: Marcos Villar

Marcos Villar — Mon, 12 Dec 2005 19:08:52 +0000

their not gonna play at superbowl 2006 ya right buddy

By: will

will — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 02:33:37 +0000

i reckon they should have done it earlier when they were more famous

By: emo -kid

emo -kid — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 02:05:06 +0000

uh..am i the only one confused on this site???

By: jairo

jairo — Wed, 07 Dec 2005 07:12:06 +0000

well, hope they working with new album so they become famous again……..and still rock the world

By: Stevee

Stevee — Tue, 06 Dec 2005 04:33:49 +0000

Yeah…well I guess that’d pretty cool… but i think I agree with DC/AK47…like why not retire? they were great but now the only reason they’re actually popular is because everyone knows them for “the band who’s been around for fourty years and can still play even though they’re geezers”…wouldn’t you want to be a band who’s known for their great music?

By: DC/AK47

DC/AK47 — Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:42:00 +0000

The Rolling Stones should have done this 40 years ago when they were cool and when they were famous,I mean they still are famous but they should retire like Zeppelin when Bonzo died.
But I’ll probably get to see The Rolling Stones I wonder how old they are 80?,90?,100?

rushinrocker666@yahoo.com
http://www.geocities.com/rushinrocker666/nightmare.html

By: licenciado preciado

licenciado preciado — Sat, 03 Dec 2005 19:35:29 +0000

y dale con los viejitos de los rolling stones